Posted: 21 August 2006
#1
John Masters
Joined: 21 August 2006
Posts: 2
Visually fantastic, overly long
I agree with your point about the film being flat in the second half, personally I think there could have been more action scenes from around the world as well.

4 out of 5 is a bit high I would give it 3 although as you point out it is visually stunning.

----------------------
Posted: 22 August 2006
#2
Mark Allchin
Joined: 13 August 2006
Posts: 2
Point Taken
Welcome to the site John.

You make a very valid point about the lack of "rest of the world" action, something I should have put in the review actually.

I would have liked to have given the film 3.5 but as I have set the site up to allow members to vote in increments of 1 I thought I should do the same for reviewers, I may change the scoring system and go for a 3 point system that scores individual areas of the movie i.e. Film, Soundtrack and on disc extras each item would be scored out of 5 and members would cast votes on the same criteria.

Do you think this would give a better overall scoring system?

----------------------
Reviewers wanted
Posted: 23 August 2006
#3
John Masters
Joined: 21 August 2006
Posts: 2
Multi points
Have to say I would go for the multi point system as it is likely to give more flexibility in scoring.

On another note what reviews do you have lined up?

----------------------
Posted: 23 August 2006
#4
Mark Allchin
Joined: 13 August 2006
Posts: 2
Re: Multi points
I think it is likely that in the very near future I will convert the site over to that kind of scoring system, it actually sounds more and more like a good idea.

I am already in the process of writing a review for Blade, Blade 2 and trinity will follow, then there are the likes of Riddick and V for Vendetta plus I am looking into getting some newer films to do as well.

----------------------
Reviewers wanted